Signed in as:
filler@godaddy.com
Signed in as:
filler@godaddy.com

All donors and patrons are automatically entered into our monthly draw for a chance to spend a week at sea as part of our crew.
Led by: Expedition Audacity Research Foundation in partnership with: Dove Joans (“DolphinGirl”), marine scientists, Indigenous knowledge holders, cetacean veterinarians, and coastal communities.
Canada is now responsible for 30 beluga whales and 4 dolphins who cannot be released directly into the wild.
These whales were born into human care.
They have never developed the hunting, navigation, or social survival skills required for open-ocean life.
Keeping them in concrete tanks is no longer ethical, sustainable, or culturally acceptable.
But releasing them abruptly into the ocean would be cruel and fatal.
We now stand at a defining moment:
Either we build sanctuaries — or we allow these whales to disappear quietly.
We refuse to let that be their future.
No single sanctuary site in Canada can safely or humanely house all belugas.
Their health, social bonds, stress profiles, and long-term wellbeing require multiple sites, each with distinct roles and environmental strengths.
The future is a network, not a single enclosure.
All three sanctuaries will be built using a dual-habitat model:
Lagoon Pool (4–5 acres)
- A protected, semi-contained, familiar environment
- Used for medical care, stress regulation, and gradual acclimation
- Calm, predictable, safe — no pressure to leave
- Some whales may remain here permanently if they choose
Sea-Pen Ocean Enclosure
- A large, open-ocean living space within natural waters
- Used for social exploration, natural behaviours, and life in the sea
- Accessed by choice through a controlled gate
- Only for whales who adapt comfortably
We do NOT force whales into ocean enclosures.
Choice is the foundation of sanctuary.
This is where Iceland has struggled — and where we refuse to repeat past harm.
Strengths
Capacity: ~10–14 belugas
Role: First relocation site; long-term home for medically or socially sensitive whales.
Includes: Lagoon + sea-pen ocean habitat
Rehabilitation & Cultural Stewardship Sanctuary
Strengths
Capacity: ~10–12 belugas
Role: Rehabilitation, social re-bonding, and culturally rooted long-term sanctuary care.
Includes: Lagoon + adaptive ocean sea-pen habitat
Nuchatlaht & Kwakwaka’wakw Waters
Strengths
Capacity: ~8–10 belugas + all 4 dolphins
Role: Pacific sanctuary, interspecies learning centre, and ethical research hub.
Includes: Lagoon + multi-pen ocean habitat structures
Whales are not attractions.
They are sovereign emotional beings — nations of minds.
Months 0–6
Months 6–12
Months 9–24
Mingan (QC) 12–18 months Social rehabilitation & cultural care sanctuary
Broughton (BC) 18–24 months Pacific sanctuary & dolphin-inclusive research hub
By Month 24:
All belugas have a safe, humane, long-term ocean home pathway.
Internationally respected marine mammal welfare advocate, trauma-transition specialist, and storyteller.
Her lived expertise in emotional care and interspecies psychology is foundational to this initiative.
Together, we bring: Science + Empathy + Story.
We are now assembling:
If that includes you—
this is the moment to step forward.
A National, Indigenous-Led, Multi-Sanctuary Future for Canada’s Captive Whales
We respect the dedication and compassion of those who have worked for years to establish the proposed sanctuary at Port Hilford Bay. Their intentions are sincere, and their commitment to improving the lives of captive whales deserves recognition.
However, we cannot support the placement of belugas in this location due to environmental conditions that pose direct health risks to the whales. Nor can we support the use of public funds to develop a site that does not meet the behavioral, medical, and psychological needs of belugas who have lived their entire lives in human care.
Port Hilford Bay lies within the historic Wine Harbour gold-mining district, where arsenic and mercury tailings from the 19th and early 20th centuries settled into the seabed.
Environmental assessments confirm that:
Therefore:
Placing belugas in this location could expose them to toxins through their own natural behaviors.
This is not theoretical.
It is established marine ecology and animal welfare science.
Recent updates from the Iceland sanctuary have shown that:
In other words:
Not every beluga is ready for full ocean exposure — even inside a sea pen.
Sanctuary design must include:
The Nova Scotia site has no such space in its operational design.
There is no fallback habitat, no quiet protected pool, no choice-based refuge.
Without this, the sanctuary may recreate the same psychological stress patterns captivity already caused — simply in a different location.
A sanctuary must offer freedom and safety, not just seawater.
We cannot support the Nova Scotia site or the allocation of public funds to it because:
This is not ideological.
It is biological, psychological, ethical, and responsible.
A sanctuary must:
If we are to move belugas out of tanks,
we cannot move them into risk.
We are advancing three sanctuary locations that meet the necessary environmental, cultural, and psychological care conditions.
All three sites are designed with:
Together, they provide:
If sanctuary means safety,
then safety cannot be compromised.
Not for sentiment.
Not for urgency.
Not for optics.
Not even for hope.
Sanctuary must honour the whales first.



Marineland opened in 1961 in Niagara Falls, Ontario — not as a theme park, but as a small roadside attraction called Marine Wonderland and Animal Farm, founded by John Holer, a Slovenian immigrant and entrepreneur. Holer envisioned it as a place where families could get close to animals they would never otherwise encounter.
Through the 1970s and 1980s, Marineland grew rapidly. The whale stadium was built. The park’s signature song “Everyone Loves Marineland” played across Ontario radio.
For many children — myself included — Marineland was the first time we looked into the eye of a whale and felt the world change a little.
But behind the nostalgia, the world was shifting.
When Marineland expanded, captivity was still seen as education. It was believed whales could inspire public love for oceans. And for a time, that was true.
But we learned.
The science evolved.
Public ethics evolved.
Understanding deepened.
By the 1990s and 2000s, global research began to show that cetaceans — whales, dolphins, belugas — are not simply animals, but highly social, culturally transmitted, emotionally intelligent beings. They form lifelong bonds, dialects, memory maps, grief practices, even humour.
The tanks stayed the same size.
The science did not.
Reports of animal welfare concerns accumulated over time — from former trainers, veterinarians, government inspectors, and journalists.
Public trust began to fracture.
Canada’s conscience shifted.
In 2019, after years of pressure from scientists, Indigenous leaders, former trainers, NGOs, and the public, the federal government passed Bill S-203, effectively banning the breeding and display of cetaceans in captivity.
Suddenly, Marineland was no longer a park.
It became a holding place for animals who could not legally leave, and could not be released.
No one wrote a plan for what comes next.
And so the whales — especially the belugas, most of whom were born at Marineland — have existed in a kind of legal and moral limbo.
Today, Marineland houses:
These animals cannot survive in the wild.
Their immune systems, social learning patterns, and foraging instincts were shaped in tanks, not seas.
Exportation was recently blocked by the federal government — closing the door to foreign transfer.
The park has signaled financial instability.
Concerns about veterinary care have resurfaced repeatedly.
The result is a historic moral responsibility:
We cannot leave the whales where they are.
We cannot release them into the wild.
And one sanctuary — even when completed — only has space for a fraction of them.
Which is how we got here.
To this moment.
To this chance.
We now stand at a crossroads Canada has never faced before:
Do we let these whales fade quietly into the past?
Or do we build a future that honours what they are — and what they have meant to us?
This is where the three-sanctuary solution comes in.
Not as protest.
Not as punishment.
But as responsibility.
Because if Marineland was the story of how we loved the ocean without knowing how,
then the sanctuaries are the story of how we love the ocean differently now.
The Future Is Not.
And we have one last chance to write it well.

Copyright © 2025 Expedition Audacity - All Rights Reserved.
Expedition Audacity Research Foundation - E.A.R Foundation 33-3246352 - 501(c)3 - Dover, Delaware.
11006126 Canada ltd - Expedition Audacity Research Foundation - Fondation de recherche Expédition Audace - 1726380-5